DeepSeek V3
Strong performance. A lighter footprint.
Find the trade-offs that matter for what you’re building.
Strong performance. A lighter footprint.
Open possibilities for builders.
Sample insights, shaped around your next decision.
DeepSeek V3 leads the sample coding score by 3.6 points.
Llama 4 costs less in a sample request with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens.
DeepSeek V3 has the higher illustrative reasoning score. Try your own prompt next.
| What matters | DeepSeek V3 | Llama 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Sample focus | Cost efficiency | Open ecosystem |
| Example use cases | Everyday · Coding | Everyday · Writing |
| Text prompts | Supported | Supported |
| Image understanding | Text-only fixture | Included in fixture |
| Reply pace | Quick | Quick |
| Example reply cost | $0.0008 | $0.0005 |
Performance and price, together in one view.
| Token type | DeepSeek V3 | Llama 4 |
|---|---|---|
| InputYour prompt | $0.27 | $0.20 |
| OutputThe response | $1.10 | $0.60 |
| ContextMaximum window | 128K | 1M |
A lower token price isn’t the whole story. Response length and your workload change the final cost.
Same workload. Two very different bills.
Llama 4 is 39.0% less for this sample workload. That’s $3.20 a month.
Illustrative, uncached text-token rates. Excludes taxes, retries and other provider charges. No payment is made.
Your prompt tells the rest.